My point of veiw for the first blog posted.

The main point of my first blog is to explain that the court system is wasting
money by having witnesses for cases where the use of a test result should be
enough for the results of the courts.The evidence that support this point is
that to many state labs technicians are having to put aside there current cases
to go to court for a previous case.Even if we are to allow the courts to only
have the test result and not to have the witnesses come to court it would add
conflict to the process if some how the results failed to gave the right
results. The state labs need to find a way to prove the machine are working
correctly, so in court the results are not thought of as being false. The
courts need to be more adjustable to the techicians who are witnesses, and find
a new way to prove the correctness of a test result. We need to find away that
the courts don't use to much time and alot of money, but at the same time let
the have the best possible knowledge to put the bad people in jail.